Page 1 of 1
Longshanks- kick him out!
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:27 pm
by novus ordo seclorum
Personally I think that Nick B has not gone far enough. This forum would return to being a nice cotton wool lined nest if Longshanks was blackballed. So I say boot him off pernanently Nick. What do the rest of you say?
NoS
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:40 pm
by spiderman
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:04 pm
by Pentlandpirate
I think NOS is Longshanks and Nick B so keep him in
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:15 pm
by canUsmellthat
Maybe you should get the boot for deviation...
Nos wrote:
"Well chaps, I'm signing off for good now. Its been a pleasure pointing out the errors of your ways over the last couple of years.
Enjoy Seil as it rapidly concretes over.
Puzzle over the lack of Island Games.
Be amused by the sheer lack of ability of anyone at Hall 'ceilidhs' to properly dance a reel.
Curse at the traffic jam of white vans queueing to refurbish another newly acquired second/retirement home.
Shed a tear when Easdale and Luing schools merge then eventually close.
Be sad when the island becomes dry.
Wonder where all the deer have gone when you eat your next venison burger.
Complain at the plague of rabbits as another fox is shot.
Last one over The Bridge switch off (the soon to arrive) traffic lights.
NoS
(seeking arcadia elsewhere)
....so long suckers!"
But he came bahack!!!
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:20 pm
by Minimum
If we kick him/her out they'll only come back as someone else anyway, if they're not already mulitple personalities. I say keep him in.
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:17 pm
by Pentlandpirate
CanU
Maybe you should get the boot for deviation...
I thought a bit of deviation was popular in the islands..............
. . . . . . . . . . . . ! :-)
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:48 pm
by NickB
.
I think NOS is Longshanks and Nick B so keep him in
Rumbled . . .
-
NickB
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:02 pm
by Seil Sally
Thanks to the anonymous aspect of this forum, Longshanks has finally found his voice.
There are so many people out there with low self-esteem and minimal ability for social interaction I think it's quite warming that he's taking part and being noticed for a change.
Consider this as therapy........the next step is venturing near the Woolpack!!!!
(
I'm kidding of course!
)
You're fired !
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:26 pm
by novus ordo seclorum
Come on chaps and chapesses; you're too soft on Shankers.
He/she has insulted just about everyone on this forum. I clicked the button "review all posts.." and found that he has appeared to refer to one longstanding memmber of the forum as :
foureyed, ecofascist, hobbitlike, geek.
Come on. Enough is enough. Give him the Red Card Nick B (unless you're him..or me...I'm confused now)
NoS
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:29 pm
by Pentlandpirate
I agree NOS, he has hardly ever been able to say something nicely without at least some sort of snide comment or p--- take of someone's username as a put-down.
However we do believe in freedom of speech, and you do have an OFF button for the TV and an IGNORE setting for this site.
If nothing else Longshanks does provoke some discussion, and he is clearly not un-intelligent: just rude!
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:35 pm
by longshanks
I'm with Capn Bob on this one
(Mugabe also got 75% so I hear)