Page 1 of 2
Ding Dong
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 1:19 pm
by Tony the Toad
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 1:41 pm
by Foxglove
Aww..I quite liked her..a strong woman! Or have I got it wrong and you are hiring a hitman for ME?
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:26 pm
by hoopster1888
proof she's going to hell!!!
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:20 pm
by Herby Dice
It's a very sad day indeed. Sad because Finlay isn't here to see it.
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 9:05 pm
by MsAnnThrope
Sad because Finlay isn't here to see it.
Tha gu dearbh.
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 11:26 pm
by Foxglove
Now...if she'd been a man then she would have gone down in history as a 'great leader'. Sadly, as a woman..she gets labelled as 'out of order'. I'm ready for the flak that may be coming..
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:02 am
by Tony the Toad
Well, she's well 'out of order' now, whatever way you look at it.
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 7:25 am
by Pentlandpirate
She was a great leader, and she showed many men how it should be done. Personally I find it disrespectful that some should want to celebrate her death. So many of those who are talking about having parties in the streets, and rioting in the cities weren't even alive when she was PM and are totally ignorant of the good she did in modernising Britain. Too long the country was stuck in the past. Our industry that was the bedrock of the industrial revolution survived the wars, unlike so much of it in mainland Europe and the Far East where it sprung up afresh after hostilities ended. In Britain we were stuck with coal mines still based on producing for the steam age, and industry still trying to find a use for itself providing armaments, uniforms and technology for war. Margaret Thatcher recognised that some industry needed to be able to stand on its own feet, and was prepared to let those that had no future go to the wall, and she created an environment that would allow new business to generate to replace it.
Some people think Margaret closed down the coal mines. But it was the Labour government that allowed more pits to close than she did.
Margaret Thatcher was a patriot. She stood up to the Germans, the French, the Russians, the Argentines. She always put Britain first. And did she ever look like she did it for her own ego and self gratification? No.
Shame on those who think of rioting in our streets: "It's fun to smash up and burn our cities". The wealth gap may have grown but I'll bet all of us are more prosperous and better off than we would have been if Britain hadn't been dragged forward by Margaret Thatcher. Some people can't be grateful for anything.
If the protesters find it is raining on Wednesday that will be Maggie p---- on them. If it's sunny you might see two fingers sticking down from the heavens.
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:16 am
by Tony the Toad
Yes, yes, Pirate. Already read all that this week in The Daily Mail. Tedious Thatcherite revisionism....
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 9:42 pm
by MsAnnThrope
Pentlandpirate wrote:that will be Maggie p---- on them
Maggie and micturition? Keep your sordid golden shower dreams to yourself Pirate.
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:05 am
by sleepy
Now, now children have some respect for the dead! Remember....
'Lord, make me an instrument of your peace,
Where there is hatred, let me sow love;
Where there is injury, pardon;
Where there is doubt, faith;
Where there is despair, hope;
Where there is darkness, light;
Where there is sadness, joy.'
What a load of patronising pish!!!!
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:19 pm
by Foxglove
Why are there so many crabbit people on this forum?
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:50 pm
by Tony the Toad
Foxglove wrote:Why are there so many crabbit people on this forum?
‘There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.’ Louis Armstrong.
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:05 pm
by Foxglove
You'd think that living in a lovely place would make a difference..imagine being in a slum in a city. I'm guessing that there are some who are bored and like a bit of a battle, or..some who are not getting enough nookie...? Someone tell me if you have any idea?
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:14 pm
by Tony the Toad
Foxglove wrote:You'd think that living in a lovely place would make a difference..imagine being in a slum in a city. I'm guessing that there are some who are bored and like a bit of a battle, or..some who are not getting enough nookie...? Someone tell me if you have any idea?
Look at the forum as being a ‘crabbit depository’ where folk can offload their crabbitness, so enabling them to enjoy the scenery. Remember, what you get on forums are online personas which do not coincide exactly with any ‘real’ person out there in the world.
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:25 pm
by Foxglove
Interesting..thankyou Tony...maybe I'm naive and gullible and take people at 'face value', faceless as some are on here..if that makes sense. Just seems to be a lot of Moaning Minnies...
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:47 pm
by sleepy
Now Foxy, lets not go down the 'Now look what's happened' route,
but, given the topic is 'Ding Dong' what do you consider to be
getting enough nookie...?
Do you have a quota in mind?
Jim, are you listening, what's your take on this?
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 5:33 pm
by Foxglove
Ding Dong.....seconds are out?
Quota for nookie....mmm...depends on age and libido I'd say..we are all different..I'm certainly no expert in these matters
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 4:07 pm
by hoopster1888
10 million for a state funeral ??????
why doesn't the Goverment buy everyone in Scotland a shovel and we'll hand her over to Satan by hand
Re: Ding Dong
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 5:55 pm
by jimcee
So, there's Foxglove and Sleepy trying to hijack this "Ding Dong" farce into a continuing flirtration.
And good luck to them in their search for personal enjoyment.
On the "Ding Dong" subject, there are a lot of people hereabouts who seem upset about M. Thatcher's reign.
Most PM's only have a very short reign, so have very little impact on the course of history but herself and that Blair fellow both had a good crack at the whip.
So in their time they had a chance to make a mark - which they both did.
I have yet to come across the perfect person and PM's are less likely to be so, more than the rest of us, given that getting there in the first place involves considerable deviousness and back stabbing.
So, in the case of Maggie, she did some good things and she did some bad (and I don't include the Poll Tax in that), but as far as I can see, her principal claim to fame is that she was the first female PM, but the "full Military Honours" rankles a bit.