Re: Dogs and the golf course
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:36 pm
Some time back in the annals of this topic one of your correspondants agreed with most of my remarks, but suggested that as a golfer myself, I might like to pass an opinion on dog walkers.
To start off on the definition of a dog walker they fall into probably two categories. Firstly, and probably the minority, keep a dog as an excuse to get some exercise themselves, to get them out of the house for a while, and have a good excuse for dodging household chores - health may come into the equation, but you do not need a dog if your doctor has told you to get some daily exercise. Secondly, and probably the majority, have dogs whose bodily functions need adressing probably about twice a day. They (the dogs) have been trained not to defecate inside the house ,and the immediate garden area is probably out of bounds also (except in cases of extreme human unwillingness to venture out of doors). Thus they seek an outdoor arena where the dog can perform as nature requires, and the (dog and human) exercise is probably secondary to the evacuation. It is unfortunate that the areas available for this function are not designated, and the owners therefore have to use whatever space they can get away with, without falling foul of the law.
While probably the majority of the dog owners on this island are reasonably responsible individuals, there are unfortunately one or two (and I am not excluding golf club members) who think that the ownership of a dog allows them the freedom to let their dog(s) run free wherever they choose. Unfortunately there is no easy solution to this problem. I have perused the website referred to, somewhere back in this thread, about how other golf courses have dealt with this problem, but their general approach seems to have been to seperate the dog walking/fouling area from the rest of the course either by fencing or tree planting - neither of which solutions are really possible here on Seil.
I would not wish to deflect this discussion away from the subject being addressed, but it might be an interesting sideline to investigate just what benefits accrue (probably more emotional than financial) to those members of society who opt to include a dog in the menage - here it might be prudent to include cats in the equation.
That diatribe might well put the cat among the pigeons.
To start off on the definition of a dog walker they fall into probably two categories. Firstly, and probably the minority, keep a dog as an excuse to get some exercise themselves, to get them out of the house for a while, and have a good excuse for dodging household chores - health may come into the equation, but you do not need a dog if your doctor has told you to get some daily exercise. Secondly, and probably the majority, have dogs whose bodily functions need adressing probably about twice a day. They (the dogs) have been trained not to defecate inside the house ,and the immediate garden area is probably out of bounds also (except in cases of extreme human unwillingness to venture out of doors). Thus they seek an outdoor arena where the dog can perform as nature requires, and the (dog and human) exercise is probably secondary to the evacuation. It is unfortunate that the areas available for this function are not designated, and the owners therefore have to use whatever space they can get away with, without falling foul of the law.
While probably the majority of the dog owners on this island are reasonably responsible individuals, there are unfortunately one or two (and I am not excluding golf club members) who think that the ownership of a dog allows them the freedom to let their dog(s) run free wherever they choose. Unfortunately there is no easy solution to this problem. I have perused the website referred to, somewhere back in this thread, about how other golf courses have dealt with this problem, but their general approach seems to have been to seperate the dog walking/fouling area from the rest of the course either by fencing or tree planting - neither of which solutions are really possible here on Seil.
I would not wish to deflect this discussion away from the subject being addressed, but it might be an interesting sideline to investigate just what benefits accrue (probably more emotional than financial) to those members of society who opt to include a dog in the menage - here it might be prudent to include cats in the equation.
That diatribe might well put the cat among the pigeons.