Seil Chat

longshanks wrote:
So, by your argument then, all the figures quoted by the SNP are meaningless.

By my argument your contribution to this thread is meaningless humbug with no internal consistency, deliberately designed to mislead.

So no change there, eh?

NickB wrote:

longshanks wrote:
So, by your argument then, all the figures quoted by the SNP are meaningless.

By my argument your contribution to this thread is meaningless humbug with no internal consistency, deliberately designed to mislead.

So no change there, eh?

Apologies.

I'll try to make my next thread a little easier to understand.

longshanks wrote:

NickB wrote:

longshanks wrote:
So, by your argument then, all the figures quoted by the SNP are meaningless.

By my argument your contribution to this thread is meaningless humbug with no internal consistency, deliberately designed to mislead.

So no change there, eh?

Apologies.

I'll try to make my next thread a little easier to understand.

Your thread was not difficult to understand. It was deliberately misleading.

NickB wrote:
Your thread was not difficult to understand. It was deliberately misleading.

Fair enough.

Remind me not to use SNP Government data again so that people are not mislead.

Thanks..