Fuel strikes - the fastest route to anarchy
Moderator: Herby Dice
Fuel strikes - the fastest route to anarchy
Fuel strikes – the fastest route to anarchy
How finely balanced our lives are on the supply of energy. And how dangerous (this will please Spiderman) is it to allow interference of the supply of fuel?
How long is it before the trucks that deliver to the food manufacturers have no fuel? How long before the trucks cannot deliver food to the shops? How long before the computer engineer cannot get to the banking and communications computers and cannot fix them because the parts cannot be delivered? How long before cash cannot be delivered to the banks and cash machines? How long before the emergency services cannot get fuel?
How long before the father with a sick child breaks in to his neighbours house and takes the food, the medicine, the cash he needs for his child to survive.
In the year 2000 we came within days of anarchy on our streets. What lessons have been learned so that we never get that close again?
How finely balanced our lives are on the supply of energy. And how dangerous (this will please Spiderman) is it to allow interference of the supply of fuel?
How long is it before the trucks that deliver to the food manufacturers have no fuel? How long before the trucks cannot deliver food to the shops? How long before the computer engineer cannot get to the banking and communications computers and cannot fix them because the parts cannot be delivered? How long before cash cannot be delivered to the banks and cash machines? How long before the emergency services cannot get fuel?
How long before the father with a sick child breaks in to his neighbours house and takes the food, the medicine, the cash he needs for his child to survive.
In the year 2000 we came within days of anarchy on our streets. What lessons have been learned so that we never get that close again?
Last edited by Pentlandpirate on Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- khartoumteddy
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:04 pm
- Location: exile
Same S##t different day
Sorry Penty
it would appear that we have still the same sorry bunch of politicians
so no change
I cant suggest a way to improve it unless you stand locally as M P but
even then it will be like making love to a hedgehog you know the rest
one pr##k working against hundreds.
Teddy
it would appear that we have still the same sorry bunch of politicians
so no change
I cant suggest a way to improve it unless you stand locally as M P but
even then it will be like making love to a hedgehog you know the rest
one pr##k working against hundreds.
Teddy
They say a strike could cost the country £50m a day. OK may be it is premature to say it will cost that immediately, but why do we let them do this to our nation? That money is needed for other things, and every one else is paying so that these protesters, blindly led by their union can get away with it.
What is wrong with stopping final salary pension schemes for workers who do not yet work for the company? Millions of other people have adapted to the idea that final salary pension schemes are a thing of the past, and now have personal pension schemes. If you're looking for a job and want a final salary pension scheme don't apply for a job with Ineos.
These striking workers, (losers, because they will be losers) should have to pay for their own strike. And any person or company suffering a loss of earnings or money as a result of a strike should be able to claim on the strikers pension fund ......until it is all gone, which won't be long.
Who ever gained from a strike, in the long run? All they do is drag us down a little further to their own level as losers.
What is wrong with stopping final salary pension schemes for workers who do not yet work for the company? Millions of other people have adapted to the idea that final salary pension schemes are a thing of the past, and now have personal pension schemes. If you're looking for a job and want a final salary pension scheme don't apply for a job with Ineos.
These striking workers, (losers, because they will be losers) should have to pay for their own strike. And any person or company suffering a loss of earnings or money as a result of a strike should be able to claim on the strikers pension fund ......until it is all gone, which won't be long.
Who ever gained from a strike, in the long run? All they do is drag us down a little further to their own level as losers.
- Eric the Viking
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:30 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Contact:
- Eric the Viking
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:30 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Contact:
- khartoumteddy
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:04 pm
- Location: exile
Look Eric, being a member of the UoOP (Union of Old Pro's) is manditory in my proffesion so i have no choice....I have no intention of joining a union when I get a real job in the social work department of A&B Council, and if I went on strike now the world sales of cheroots and malt whisky would go up overnight...so I would be doing some good to the economy....all be it France.
Going back to the original statement, does anyone agree that this strike seems to have been a bit of a storm in a tea cup? Surely they wont restart the plant if there are threats of more strikes and Alex Salmond seems to think the pensions issues will soon be resolved.
Still, it gve us all something different to talk about for a few days.
Still, it gve us all something different to talk about for a few days.
- Eric the Viking
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:30 pm
- Location: Asgard
- Contact:
If you're going to speak in "claire" english then I'd have to say:
Yes - In a classical sense it's a post-structuarlist dichotomy - On one hand the strikers are representative of the emancipation from female suffrage whereas in the broad sense the reson detre of management can be equated in a metaphorical and allegorical sense to the struggle to maintain the gender dominant role.
I find the whole juxtaposition so cathartic.
Yes - In a classical sense it's a post-structuarlist dichotomy - On one hand the strikers are representative of the emancipation from female suffrage whereas in the broad sense the reson detre of management can be equated in a metaphorical and allegorical sense to the struggle to maintain the gender dominant role.
I find the whole juxtaposition so cathartic.
Om jeg hamrer eller hamres,
ligefuldt så skal der jamres!
ligefuldt så skal der jamres!
-
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests