Beyond the 2014 referendum
Moderator: Herby Dice
-
NickB
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2514
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 10:18 pm
- Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land (or so I'm told by some)
-
Contact:
Post
by NickB »
longshanks wrote:
So, by your argument then, all the figures quoted by the SNP are meaningless.
By my argument your contribution to this thread is meaningless humbug with no internal consistency, deliberately designed to mislead.
So no change there, eh?
NickB
(site admin)
-
longshanks
Post
by longshanks »
NickB wrote:longshanks wrote:
So, by your argument then, all the figures quoted by the SNP are meaningless.
By my argument your contribution to this thread is meaningless humbug with no internal consistency, deliberately designed to mislead.
So no change there, eh?
Apologies.
I'll try to make my next thread a little easier to understand.
-
NickB
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2514
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 10:18 pm
- Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land (or so I'm told by some)
-
Contact:
Post
by NickB »
longshanks wrote:NickB wrote:longshanks wrote:
So, by your argument then, all the figures quoted by the SNP are meaningless.
By my argument your contribution to this thread is meaningless humbug with no internal consistency, deliberately designed to mislead.
So no change there, eh?
Apologies.
I'll try to make my next thread a little easier to understand.
Your thread was not difficult to understand. It was deliberately misleading.
NickB
(site admin)
-
longshanks
Post
by longshanks »
NickB wrote:
Your thread was not difficult to understand. It was deliberately misleading.
Fair enough.
Remind me not to use SNP Government data again so that people are not mislead.
Thanks..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests