Trident

Beyond the 2014 referendum

Moderator: Herby Dice

Post Reply
User avatar
NickB
Site Admin
Posts: 2514
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 10:18 pm
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land (or so I'm told by some)
Contact:

Trident

Post by NickB »

.
Scotland’s Referendum isn’t about two different destinations; It’s a fork in the road. It’s about the nation we are, and the nation we want to be.

Image



Vote Yes to scrap Trident
~ All pro-independence political parties in Scotland support the removal of nuclear weapons from Scottish waters.
~ With independence, Scotland could spend those extra millions on healthcare, education or policing – using our taxes to improve lives, not end them.
~ We could use Faslane, where the weapons are held today, to harbour a navy that is better suited to today’s security situation – Trident is a useless relic from the Cold War that won’t keep us safe from the threats we face.
~ The Westminster government would struggle to find somewhere to put their nuclear weapons if Scotland refused to look after them – so Scottish independence helps global nuclear disarmament

Vote No to keep Trident
~ All the Westminster parties are committed to keeping nuclear weapons in Scotland, despite polls showing that a majority of Scots want to get rid of them.
~ Trident currently costs us £1.5bn every year, and Westminster’s planned renewal will cost up to £100bn over its lifetime.
~ Scotland harbours the largest concentration of nuclear weapons in Western Europe with 180 warheads, each of which is 8 times as powerful as the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. Every one of those warheads could kill millions of people.
~ Faslane remains a target for attack as long as it houses the UK’s nuclear arsenal
NickB
(site admin)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests