OK Nick, you continue your vendetta, if it gives you any satisfaction.
But don't forget that sauce for the goose is also sauce for the gander.
During the referendum campaign your "glorious leader" (the previous one) made some unsubstantiated claims , (notice that I have not used the word lies) which presumably you thought were justified, and will defend "tooth and nail" all in the interests of the cause.
Please let us have a bit of balance in these deliberations.
Jim, if you want to slag off Salmond and point out things he said which you consider to be untrue, deceptive or misleading then please do. I may defend him if I feel your criticisms are unfair, but I promise will not accuse you of bias or operating a vendetta.
You really need to calm down and engage in the discussion; demanding balance and then refusing to provide any is frankly absurd.
a one sided attack on anything anti SNP, to me, shows a complete lack of critical ability in the belief that the SNP can do no wrong
What utter guff. This thread is about one LibDem politician, and in particular it is about his actions over 'Frenchgate'. In what way can it possibly be construed as an attack on 'anything anti-SNP' ??
You really need to try to be a little more on-topic with your posts. I think we are all a trifle bored with every post you make doing nothing but slagging other posters off while making no factual, informative or indeed relevant comments yourself.